Here I will display my reasons for and against each version of my “Cheater” narrative. And why I have decided on a version.

This version of the “Cheater” narrative will be similar to the second version, in terms of having the flashback dispersed across the film. But instead of having thew protagonist witnessing the cheating at a party, it will be just out and about in Liverpool Town Centre instead.

In this second version of my “Cheater” narrative, the main differences will be me making more flashbacks to spread them out across the film. I will do this to maintain the sense of ambiguity of the dilemma the protagonist is in until the end. And to have a more effective build-up using sound design to make the scenes unfold more patiently.

After brainstorming a list of moral dilemmas that more people could relate to. I came up with a moral dilemma of a girl who knows that her friend is being cheated on by her boyfriend. In situation, the dilemma is that is that if the protagonist tells her friend she is being cheated on, she will be sad and probably be angry because she gave the bad news, and if she dosn’t know, she will be cheated on again.

Here I will present my initial pitch and comment on some feedback I got afterwards.

This is the second version of the coin toss narrative idea.

After my initial pitch feedback, I decided to change my idea.